New York is taking on its severe shortage of housing with an innovative two-pronged approach: The Pro-Housing Communities Program that encourages local governments to increase the supply of homes coupled with groundbreaking regulatory changes to erase antiquated density caps that have long impeded construction. Together, these strategies form a new way to counter the housing affordability economy by marrying carrots and regulatory fixes.
The Pro-Housing Communities Program: The Lap Of Low-Risk Luxury
The Pro-Housing Communities Program, was created by the state in 2023 to give preferential access to discretionary funding for municipalities that show a commitment to housing growth. To get certified, municipalities must apply and demonstrate that they have made tangible contributions to support housing, like streamlining permitting processes, adopting pro-housing policies or providing crucial housing or zoning data. It has been a powerful program: By early 2025, 213 municipalities had started the application process and 61 communities had been certified. Today the total number of certified communities is 273.
The incentive structure is strong: certified communities become eligible for $650 million of state discretionary funding across multiple programs, including the Downtown Revitalization Initiative, NY Forward and Main Street Program. This strategy has galvanized municipal communities throughout the state, from New York City to rural counties, to synchronize housing policies with state objectives. The program is innovative in that it allows communities to customize solutions locally based on local needs, while all contribute to the same goal of increasing housing supply.
Cutting Through Those Archaic Density Limits: The Regulatory Front
At the same time that incentives are encouraging local participation, Governor Kathy Hochul's administration is fighting outdated zoning laws that make it all-but-illegal to develop housing. 2025 Fiscal Year Enacted Budget shows that New York City's obsolete residential density controls — some in effect since the 1960s — are now allowed to be voided. The caps have successfully rationed the number of housing units that could be built on a particular piece of land, irrespective of market demand or community need.
The budget also adds a new 485-x tax incentive to succeed the expired 421-a program, which provides incentives for housing construction in New York City, but with required affordability and labor standards. And the state extended a completion deadline for projects under the lapsed 421-a program to 2031, preserving thousands of planned rental units — including affordable housing — that had been in danger of being abandoned. For counties outside New York City, the budget includes tax incentives for mixed-income and 100-percent affordable multifamily rental projects.
Synergy in Practice: The Reinforcing Relationship Between the Two Practices
The real innovation, however, is in the way these approaches all fit together. The Pro-Housing Communities Program cultivates the political climate for densification reforms by enrolling cities in a coalition that has a stake in expanding housing. At the same time, scrapping of density controls gives these communities room to dream. This convergence is most clearly seen in policies promoting transit-oriented development and ADUs, both of which extract more density from developed areas.
To further these projects, the state has provided significant capital investments — a $500 million fund for the construction of up to 15,000 housing units on land owned by the state and more than $600 million in additional capital funds for housing construction across New York. These funds are essential in helping to fill the funding gap on projects that would be difficult or impossible to make financially feasible, especially in high cost markets.
Conclusion
The Pro-Housing Communities Program and density restriction reforms are nothing if not a dramatic break with the past in New York's housing policy. In providing local governments with financial incentives while simultaneously breaking down antiquated barriers at the state level, New York has built a strong housing production machine. The full consequences will play out over the span of years, but as a road map for tackling housing shortfalls while accommodating local governance structures, this one-two punch could be contagious.
